First Summer Session
M-Thursday 1:30-3:10 (100 minutes)
How can Movies be Political?
You probably consider movies principally as entertainment. I agree.
But they are a great deal more. They are an art form; they can influence
peoples' beliefs and experience, they can be propaganda. They are the most
powerful political element in the lives of citizens. Political campaigns
for president may last a year every four years and most people learn about
them on television news in short several second sound bites. Films are
captivating for almost two hours. They reveal the character of a nation
and its culture. They serve as the principal means for socialization in
society outside family and school.
The films that I am selecting are able to depict a multi-dimensional
orientation to politics from the personal, through social, ethnic, national
and international levels. They demonstrate how the individual plays a political
role by working out his or her personal needs and responds to identity
within the social
For example, the film City Hall (directed by Harold Becker with Al Pacino demonstrates the kinds of political deals and tradeoffs that politicians engage in to enhance their power for implementing public policy, but it also calls up the dilemmas in making such compromises that are ethically questionable, immoral or illegal. There are a number of books and writings that students can read that can lead to further understanding. Books on Tammany Hall and local political organizations, historical accounts of political leaders such as James Daley and Fiorello La Guardia. Another film dealing with the election process is Michael Ritchie’s The Candidate with Robert Redford that is a very contemporary account of the organizational process in political campaigns and the myth creating necessity of winning. There are many books and articles that provide valuable background for the student to realize that even though this is a fictional account it draws on actual political events.
The integrating value of a film course is its strongest contribution to understanding politics. It demonstrates that political phenomena cut across disciplines. Single discipline approaches to understanding politics cannot be seen in isolation as valuable was of analyzing the various facets of human political and social existence. In our analysis of course it is important to address the director and writers motivations and message in making the film. Discussions can center on the elements of bias and political orientation of the director and to what extent is the film an accurate account of political reality.
Probably the most valuable contribution films can make to the study of politics is its heuristic value. Films unlike studying politics in newspapers or journals are narrative and have a story line in which the observer can see how events are related and understand the cause-effect relationships. Of course films only show one or a few aspects of politics, but they do so with "real" people responding to problems or pursuing a course of action. Political books do this as well, of course. The promise of such a film course goes beyond even understanding politics. It could lead to enabling the students to develop their own narrative about political events either from news stories or from their own imagination. The students can be encouraged to write a short story at first based on a political event or a series of events. The possibilities are endless.
On Developing a Theme
To avoid vagueness and lack of continuity I have select the following themes as common to these films: Personality, Ideology. Organization, and Power in the political films. The films below will focus on the nature of the political personality and how he or she perceives and pursues power as a means of symbolically satisfying individual needs and goals. Accordingly the power strategies are justified or rationalized by commitment to a particular ideology or set of beliefs. Some of them pit real politik against individual ethics, and in others the hero or heroine is pursuing idealistic values. Secondary purposes include the structure of organization, non-political values such as personal revenge, romance, social acceptance, and duty)
I have selected the films under Catergory B
(below) and have identified the principal aspects of the film for which
I chose them:.
Readings and Assignments
The following are my proposed assignments and the
grading procedure. I say "proposed" because I want each of you to have
a voice on how you are going to be graded and the work you will be doing.
This is what I propose:
Category A: Readings:
I have placed the following articles on interpreting
political films on reserve in the library. I will ask each of you to volunteer
to lead the discussion on a particular chapter from these readings. I list
them below.
The readings will constitute material that I have
collected from several sources
|
|
|
| 1.Politics and the Cinema: An Introduction to Political Films by Michael Genovese | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3.From Mouse to Mermaid: The Politics of Film, Gender, and Culture. by Elizabeth Bell, Lynda Haas, and Laura Sells, eds. Chapter Three: Pinocchio | |
| 4.Reel Politics:American Political Movies from Birth of a Nation to Platoon by Terry Christensen. A.Foreword: Messages are Not Only for Western Union | |
| B."The Country
Needs a Man":
Political Movies in the Early Thirties |
|
| C. "We're the People": Reel Politics in the Late Thirties | |
| D.There are no Leaders but Yourselves: Post-War Optimism, Liberalism, and Corruption | |
| E."How doYou Know They'll Print it?": Cynicism and Paranoia in the Seventie\ | |
| F."It Don't Worry Me": The Revenge of the Blacklist and the Emergence of | |
| G.Disillusionment | |
| H.God Bless America": Hollywood Confronts Vietnam | |
| I."Do We Get to Win This Time?": The New Patriotism | |
| J.Afterword: Reel Politics | |
| 5. Hollywood's America: United States History Through Its Films by Steven Mintz and Randy Roberts | |
| A.Reaffirming Traditional Values. Pp. 275-283 | |
| 6.Movies and Politics: The Dynamic Relationship by James Combs | |
| A.Introduction: Understanding the Politics of Movies | |
| B.Leatherstockingf in 'Nam: Rambo, Platoon, and the American Frontier Myth (Harold Schecter and Jonna G. Semeiks) |
Category B: Viewing the Films
We will review approximately 12 films this summer.
After each viewing we will discuss the political implications of each film;
the discussions will be held on the following day.
A semi-fictional account of electing an attractive young man to the U.S. Senate from California based on the techniques of modern campaign strategies/
Mr.Smith Goes to Washington
1. How does Frank Kapra see politics in Washington?
2. What does he see as the solution to political malaise there?
3. How well does Kapra’s orientation to political life fit the realities
of politics in the United States?
4. How would you describe Jefferson Smith as a political leader?
5. Is the Jefferson smith story likely to happen in Washington today?
Why or why not?
6. What does this film tell us about politics?
City Hall
1. What is the cause of the political entanglements that the mayor
has found himself in?
2. Why did the mayor construct the deals?
3. What mistakes did the mayor make in his approach to politics
in New York?
How would you depict the mayor?
4. Was he only out for power and control over others?
5. Was he a victim of a corrupt political system?
6. Was his choice of an assistant mayor a wise one? Why?
7. Was it possible that the mayor could have rejected the pressure
to force the judge to give the son of the Mafia leader only probation?
8. Could the political mess have been foreseen?
9. What would you have done in the mayor’s position?
Category D: Writing on Films
I suggest you choose 10 of the 12 films and write a brief summary
of the film, its political implications, and the statement the film makes
about American political culture.
Students will read a review of the films when possible to help them.
This can be taken from the web and newspapers and magazines. I suggest
the following web sites:
http://us.imdb.com/a2z,
http://us.imdb.com/Sections/Plots,
http://www.desert.net/filmvault/index.html,
Category E: Voluntary Film
Students can if they wish introduce a political
film of their choosing and introduce it to the class.
Grading
I suggest that the grades be based on a combination
of three factors: papers on each film, class discussion, and the individual
choice of film.
Papers on films: 70% based on class discussions
and readings
Class discussions and presentation of a film 30%
These percentages of course are open for discussion.
Schedule of Classes and Films
26 class days
|
|
|||
| Monday | Tuesday
|
Wednesday
May 19 Introduction to the films and the course |
Thursday
May 20 Film: Mon Oncle d’Amerique 123min. |
|
|
|||
| May 24
Discussion of Mon Oncle and review of student articles |
May 25
Film: Love and Anarchy |
May 26
Discussion of Love and Anarchy. Review of articles on Italy and Fascism. |
May 27
Film:Viva Zapata 113 min. |
|
|
|||
| May 31
Discussion of Viva Zapata and articles on Mexican history |
June 1
Film: Michael Collins 132 min. |
June 2
Discussion of Michael Collins and Irish politics |
June 3
Discussion (cont.) |
|
|
|||
| June 7
Film: Paths of Glory 87 min. |
June 8
Discussion of Paths of Glory |
June 9
State of Seize 115 min. |
June 10
Film: A Place in the World 120 min. |
|
|
|||
| June 14
Discussion of a Place in the World and Argentine politics |
June 15
Film: A Man for All Seasons 120 min. |
June 16
Discussion
|
June 17
Film: The Candidate 114 min. |
|
|
|||
| June 21
Bandit Queen |
June 22
Discussion |
June 23
Mr. Smith Goes to Washington 125 min. |
June 24
Discussion |
|
|
|||
| June 28
Film: City Hall 112 min. |
June 29 | June 30
Little Drummer Girl 130 min.
|
July 1 |