Sherif, M. In Common Predicament, 1966, Chapter 5

This paper is about intergroup relations at a summer camp.

Boys at a summer camp were divided into groups with leaders, and the groups competed against each other, generating feelings of competition, hostility and social distance. Later, they were brought together in activities designed to reduce hostility and rivalry between groups.

Three experiments were conducted. The first two were terminated during the group hostility stages, but the final experiment was continued to intergroup activities. The boys were 11-12 years old. They were interviewed and analyzed before selection and selected to minimize effects of prior acquantances, neurotic tendencies, major physical or racial differences. All subjects were well adjusted boys of white, middle classe Prostetant families.

During the camp "counselors" made observations of groups that were backed up with independent observations from others not associated with particular groups. Sociometric choices arose from casual conversations with the boys. Some attitude assessments were introduced as games.

Initially the boys were housed as one big group, and after they began forming friendships based on personal interests, they were assessed for "best friends" and then the "best friends were split up" into separate groups who immediately began a group task (an overnight trip). After the trip a new assessment revealed that the "best friends" had shifted to within the group.

The researchers concluded that friendship choices shift readily from strictly interpersonal attractions toward in-group exclusiveness, as a part of group formation and functioning.

On the third experiment, the boys were divided into two groups and contact prevented between groups initially. Through a series of group activities (cooking, cleaning, etc.), the boys started developing a hierarchy with a leader and "lieutenants". The relative position in the group was determined by a boy's effctive initiative within the group.

One study (hitting balls at a unmarked target) showed that the boys overestimated the performance of the leaders and underestimated the scores of the lower-ranked boys.

Conclusion from researchers was that "group organiztion (structure) and group norms are products of interation among individuals in activities embodying goals of high appeal value, and requiring performance of interdependent tasks."

Individuals who did not support the group or who tried to bully were "punished" by others through correctives or cold-shouldering.

Then the groups competed against each other in a series of sports activities. The two groups soon developed rivalries and hostilities toward each other, and pulled pranks against the rival group. However the competition increased solidarity within each group. In a bean counting game, members overestimated # beans picked up by their own members, and underestimated those of rival members. The other group became the "enemy".

Now the researcher's objective was to increase cooperation among groups by setting up activities that could be completed only by joint cooperation among the two groups. Initially, merely putting the two groups together for activities only worsened the taunting and teasing.

Then the researchers arranged various "superordinate" activities. The two groups had to solve a water shortage problem, and pooled money together to get a movie both groups wanted. They also used a tug-of-war rope to jump start a truck together. Gradually through these activities the intergroup hostilities were reduced. By the end the groups were basically friendly toward each other, and friendships formed across groups.

Reduction of hostility occured through better information between groups and intergroup contacts.